Shortly after writing the below linked post;
about Louise Lerner’s deleted emails and the IRS politically persecuting Tea Party groups by denying their non-profit 5013c applications, I get this in the mail. It was written only 21 days after the above linked post.
I have NEVER received so many views for a post so fast, 127 the day after publishing. Gee, I wonder if it was because I was writing about work that I had done in the past. Do ya think that the IRS might have been extra interested in the tax possibilities contained therein? Hmmm….
If you are going to be attacked just because you get reminiscent about having at one time been a good worker and post about it, why on earth would you ever think about working again? Instead of encouraging admirable behavior, they punish it instead. What kind of screwed up, crazy insane social planning is that? Hell, if you knew that the IRS was monitoring your every public thought and then would pounce on you whenever those thoughts strayed towards working again, what practical message would you be left with? I think it safe to say that you would probably be discouraged from ever even thinking of trying to go back to work again. Why should you? Just so you can go back to work only for them and then be punished for it to boot? STUPID and CRIMINAL. This is not what America is supposed to be about. Indentured servitude? GIVE ME A BREAK.
SLAVERY, THREAT, HARASSMENT, FULL SPECTRUM OPPRESSION and in my case, harassment by “Thought Police”.
Below are my Social Security Benifits statements beginning in 1984 and ending in 2012. In all of those years my taxed earned income never amounted to more than $13,000 total in one year by their accounting. Since 2005 to present, that amount has been a whopping, big, fat zero $0. I own nothing but the junk in my 150 square foot room and the clothes on my back yet somehow, I owe the IRS $10,000 ten thousand dollars. I DON’T EVEN GET TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS IN AN ENTIRE YEAR FROM SOCIAL SECURITY! Since the IRS can only steal my mothers burial insurance, you have to ask yourself, just why are they interested in little ole me? Is it because of the damaging but factual things that I write and say?
What Taxpayers Pay When Eric Holder Uses Government Jets For Personal Trips
Posted By Alex Pappas On 10:17 PM 08/11/2014
On a pleasant Saturday this summer, Eric Holder, his daughters, their boyfriends and two security officers boarded a government-owned Gulfstream and jetted off to New York for the Belmont Stakes Thoroughbred horse race.
Even for personal trips like this, the attorney general doesn’t fly commercial. For security reasons, Holder — like other top government officials — flies a government plane, though is required to reimburse taxpayers for airfare.
According to records obtained by The Daily Caller through a Freedom of Information Act request, Holder is getting pretty good deal here — especially when he flies a government-owned Gulfstream V jet.
That one day trip to Elmont, N.Y. on June 7, according to records provided to TheDC by the Department of Justice, ended up costing the government $14,440.
But Holder only had to reimburse the government $955 for flying him and four passengers to the final leg of the Triple Crown horse races that day.
That’s because he only has to pay the equivalent cost of a coach commercial airline ticket for each non-law enforcement passenger — not the total cost to charter the plane.
“The attorney general wrote a check payable to the U.S. Treasury in the amount of $955.00 to cover round trip airfare” for each passenger, the documents provided by the Department of Justice said.
During his trip, Holder and his entourage met with Ron Turcotte, the retired race jockey who famously rode Triple Crown winner Secretariat in 1973. The attorney general also stopped for photos with spectators, including with one attorney decked out in a seersucker suit and bow-tie.
While the Department of Justice declined to identify his travel companions that day, Holder’s daughters, Brooke and Maya, went on the trip, and brought along two friends. A photo taken that day shows the two young women, wearing summer dresses, and their male companions, in suits.
“The names of family members and personal guests are withheld…” Department of Justice general counsel Arthur E. Gary wrote in a letter to TheDC accompanying the documents. “On balance, I have determined that the privacy interest of the individuals outweighs the public interest in disclosure of this information.”
A spokesman for Holder has not returned requests for additional details.
The Daily Caller first inquired about the Belmont Stakes trip in June. At the time, TheDC filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Department of Justice. On Aug. 8, the agency provided copies of documents detailing the trip.
A government policy known as OMB circular A-126 lays out the rules about the personal travel of government officials.
“The government shall be reimbursed the appropriate share of the full coach fare for any portion of the time on the trip spent on political activities,” it says.
According to the military, the Gulfstream V “is an all-weather, long-range, high speed aircraft powered by two Rolls-Royce BR 710-A2 turbofan engines with thrust reversers. The aircraft has an executive compartment with accommodations for six passengers and a staff compartment with accommodations for eight passengers.”
Holder’s usage of Gulfstream jets has made news before: The New York Post reported that Holder in 2010 reimbursed the government $421 for a $15,000 flight.
And last year, the Government Accountability Office released a report saying these government jets used by Holder and FBI Director Robert Mueller were meant to be used for counter-terrorism actions.
“These luxury jets were supposedly needed for counterterrorism, but it turns out that they were used almost two-thirds of the time for jet-setting executive travel,” Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley said. “Nobody disputes that the Attorney General and the FBI Director should have access to the secure communications, but, for instance, there’s no reason they can’t take a less expensive mode of transportation, or cut their personal travel.”
Article printed from The Daily Caller: http://dailycaller.com