This is video that I shot on Columbus day, October 13th, 2014. Look at the last part when I pan directly overhead, you can almost see the particles falling down.
Please also watch the second video by US Air Force whistleblower Kristen Meghan, a true heroine.
So, How Do We Stop The Spraying?
All that know about the horrific crime of “stratospheric aerosol geoengineering” (SAG) or “solar radiation management” (SRM) want an answer to the question, how do we stop it? Though there are no easy answers, the most straight forward solution is the most likely to succeed. We must all continue to focus on effectively and credibly raising public awareness until we reach critical mass. We are getting closer to this with each passing day. This battle plan sounds so very generic, but in fact it is the most solid path forward. If all pulled together, the fight to expose the globally decimating aerosol spraying programs could very soon reach the tipping point.
The Concerted, Coordinated Government Agency Cover-Up
By Adriana Scott Oct. 16, 2014 | 5:45 p.m. EDT
WMD were found in Iraq but does it matter?
The New York Times published an article this week that has re-ignited a 12-year-old debate: Was then-President George W. Bush right about Iraq? The report examined U.S. service personnel’s encounters with abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq – and some conservatives were quick to pounce on the story as evidence that claims by Bush in the lead-up to the war that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction were true and that the United States’ 2003 invasion was justified.
The article by Times reporter C.J. Chivers focused on U.S. soldiers who suffered from exposure to the sulfur mustard and other nerve gases which emitted from the bombs. According to the story, about “5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs” were found scattered across Iraqi soil. The U.S. government buried the cases from both the public and the troops. As a result, injured soldiers did not receive proper medical treatment.
“Conservatives may hope to exploit the New York Times report, but the article references pre-1991 weapons,” wrote Steve Benen on the MaddowBlog. “Everything Republicans said in the lead up to the 2003 invasion is still wrong. Indeed, a little common sense is in order – if U.S. troops had found WMD stockpiles, the Bush/Cheney administration would have said so. Indeed, they were desperate to do exactly that.”
Governments lie about everything. Regarding the issue of geoengineering, the doors to all government representatives and all government agencies have been locked and shackled shut. Those behind the spraying operations have made vast preparations to protect these programs and keep them hidden in plain sight over the course of decades. They have left no stone unturned, no door unlocked, as I stated. Governmental agencies like “Water Quality” and “Air Quality” have been structured in a manner to mask the mountain of toxic fallout from the weather/climate modification programs.
In California for example, State Water Quality stopped testing for aluminum in 02′. CARB (California Air Resources Board) also does not even look for such contaminants. I personally attended a high level CARB closed door meeting in Sacramento, California, which was arranged by a congressional representative. There were 5 high level CARB officials in attendance. I was told to my face that they are mandated to test for “combustion particulates only”. The rest of the air samples apparently go out the window. Certainly it would be hard to find what you are told not to look for.
The testing of regional air quality agencies is never going to show the fallout from the aerosol spraying as the geoengineering particles are far too small to be picked up by all, but the most sophisticated and expensive and specialized air testing equipment. Politicians, federal agencies, and government representatives are also a dead end brick wall. Most simply produce the public propaganda sheet from NASA which states “Chemtrails are a hoax”. “Chemtrails”? Did I even mention this term to these people? No. I supplied data only on SAG (stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) and SRM (solar radiation management). Does NASA’s disinformation sheet mention anything about geoengineering being a hoax? No chance. Their disinformation sheet does not even mention the “geoengineering” term (use the science terms to gain credibility).
They’ve Sold Us Down a Toxic River
For virtually all “bought and paid for” government officials, the NASA “chemtrails hoax” sheet is an easy out. This includes supposedly environmentally minded congress woman Barbara Boxer. I have been in her office also, to absolutely no avail. A comeplete dead end.
I have spoken in front of the entire CARB board, supplying them and their scientists with hard science data and videos. Nothing. I have done the same in front of the California Energy Commission (who admitted on the record the State of California was losing 20% or more of its rainfall from “particulates of unknown origin”). No response whatsoever from them, such “dead ends” should be expected for a number of reasons.
Any and all government scientists have no first amendment rights. None seem to have the courage to risk their jobs in spite of the fact that the ongoing atmospheric geoengineering is putting all life on Earth in the balance.
Agencies answer to State officials whose existence is now dependent on backdoor funding from the Federal Reserve to the tune of tens of billions. In the case of California, about 30 billion a year or more from the FED appears to be the only thing keeping the State going. Spineless State officials are not about to risk their positions by allowing state agencies to raise a red flag on the horrific contamination from the spraying. If they did sound the alarm, the fiat money from the Federal Government, which keeps the state afloat, would certainly be shut down.
We Must Expose the Spraying
The bottom line is this: it’s up to all of us and each of us to expose the spraying. For any that engage in objective hard research on the subject of geoengineering, and its already known consequences, it is inevitable to conclude that our lives quite literally depend on stopping these programs. The atmospheric spraying is poisoning every breath we take, shredding the ozone, decimating the Earth’s hydrological cycle causing drought and deluge, sterilizing soils and waters with toxic metals and chemicals, blocking natural sunlight and causing massive fungal proliferation and contamination. There is more, but the point should be clear.
How do we do this? By making it our mission (each and every one of us) to put credible and compelling data into the hands of people, groups, and organizations, that would care, if they only knew. Such a list of target recipients is almost endless. Alzheimer’s groups, autism, ADD, environmental, farm, organic foods, ranchers, forestry, journalists, etc. We need to be thorough. Information can be given in a number of ways. From one’s own home computer appropriate people and groups can be located. Credible e-mails can be sent with a few solid articles on the subject attached (check the geoengineeringwatch.org home page for “activist suggestions” and “flaming arrows”). Postal addresses can be found to mail DVD’s on the subject of geoengineering such as the film “Look Up” by film maker George Barnes. Start spot fires of awareness that will grow into blazes that cannot be put out.
Awareness Reaching Critical Mass
If critical mass of awareness can be reached, then people in the military, that are not currently aware of what they are participating in, would likely begin to refuse to participate. They would be aware of the dangers posed to themselves and their families from this lethal spraying. They would understand that by participating in these programs, they are literally killing themselves and their families slowly and surely along with the rest of us. As the army of the aware grows, the foundation of the insanity will crumble.
Every day the spraying continues, the nails are being pounded into our collective coffins. This is not alarmism or exaggeration, it is fact. There is again an ever growing mountain of data to back up this conclusion for any that bother to do honest investigation. One can search “negative effects of geoengineering” on any search engine. Numerous articles on the subject can also be found on “geoengineeringwatch.org” or other geoengineering sites.
People Will Listen
If you connect with people in a manner they can relate to, they will listen. I recently connected with the head of the Northern California Cattleman’s Association. What was he most interested in knowing? How geoengineering programs are negatively affecting him and his fellow ranchers, reducing rainfall, stunting the growth of native grasses and feed crops due to the toxic contamination and the shredding of the ozone layer (which also harms feed crops). These aspects of the global spraying are very clearly causing very negative impacts to him, so he wanted to know more. If you learn enough about this issue to inform people how they personally are being affected, given what you specifically know about their interests, they will listen.
Stopping the spraying is up to all of us. Don’t run around randomly ranting to people about this dire issue, this can do far more harm than good. Give them credible data to examine with sources for more information. Ask them to help spread the word after they have investigated themselves. If one person tells two on the first day, and those two tell two more each on the second day, and so on, at the end of thirty days, over 5 million would know.
Don’t sit the bench, help those of us that are working on this issue 24/7. Our collective fate is in the balance. It’s up to all of us and it’s now or never.